Last week I posted here about how I wished I sought out more poetry. I like poetry, I just forget to seek it out, and since it is not shelved in my collection area, I need to work harder to simply remember it.
But then I got to thinking about genres and authors I should like in theory, but when I actually read them, I just don't.
Here are some examples.
China Mieville is an author I should love. His books are genre benders that mix fantasy and science fiction. They are intricately plotted, with awesome world-building and lots of social commentary. But every time I read one, I am disappointed. Usually it is the characters and the endings that let me down. I really want to like Mieville, but it just never comes together for me.
I also do not like Mysteries as much as I think I should. I have a few series I like a lot, but I like those because of the characters or the setting. In general, I am always annoyed at how neatly mysteries end. The bad guy is caught and the good guys prevail. Mystery has none of the anxiety and uncertainty I love in horror and psychological suspense.
Here is an example of these mixed feelings from when I read Jo Nesbo's The Snowman. I loved the book until the movie-like ending. It wrapped up too neatly for me. But even though I know that Mysteries always end happily resolved without any ambiguity, I keep trying to find one I will love without reservation.
What about you? For today's Monday Discussion, share an author, genre, or format you wish you liked more.
For past Monday Discussions, click here.
StokerCon 2018 Report - Horror legend Ramsey Campbell and editor Don D'Auria in the hotel lobbyI spent 2/28-3/4 in Providence at StokerCon 2018 in the Biltmore Hotel. I was the or...
1 week ago