[Ed's Note: Sorry for the delay. I had a meeting that took up most of my day.]
Today's Monday Discussion is to satisfy my own curiosity.
Over the weekend I finished Joe Hill's awesomely creepy, anxiety producing new horror opus, NOS4A2. I loved every pulse quickening moment of it. A review will come very soon.
Without much thought, I went right into the YA title Eleanor and Park by Rainbow Rowell, another book I have been dying to read. While my brain knew that Eleanor and Park was a realistic teen story set in 1986, my emotions were still in the world of NOS4A2. As a result. for the first 100 pages of the teen title, I was waiting for a villain to kidnap Eleanor or Park, I was figuratively peering around the corner looking for evil lurking in the shadows, and I was still completely unsettled. This is crazy because while Eleanor and Park is framed around their reading of Romeo and Juliet in school (so you know things will not end well here), there is no chance for a supernatural evil to kill them.
I literally had to put the teen book down and give myself some emotional space for a bit.
Now I am all good, but it did make me think about how a book may read differently depending on what you read immediately before it, especially with those of us who read so many books right in a row. I even went back at looked at some of my reviews to see if this has happened before, and I realized that when I reviewed Haruki Murakami's 1Q84 I noted, in the readalike section, how its proximity to my reading of Stephen King's 11/22/63 made me think of the two as readalikes.
So I guess this happens more than I think. At least for me.
So that leads to today's Monday Discussion. Does this ever happen to you? Do you read a book differently depending on what you read before it?
For past Monday Discussions click here.
Horror Reviews Index Update - I have added three new reviews from the December 2017 issue of Indie Picks Magazine to the index. Click here to pull up only these reviews. [image: The Co...
1 day ago